Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Oh, really?
And those are just few examples I found searching the document for 'no evidence', plenty more if you search for 'bias'.
One of their tasks was to see if the decisions concerning the Clinton investigation were influenced by "improper considerations". Says so right in the report, page 1 (2 in PDF).
As for the Clinton investigation in general, the report blows some pretty big holes in the Trumpster narrative. Might want to have a read the next time you plan on using the "But her eeeemaaails" argument.  |
Word searches, really? Please use common sense for a moment. What is your motive for posting here? What decision have you ever made in life that did not have a motive? Unless you are a mindless bag of rocks you have a reason for everything you do in life even when it comes too improper considerations. The IG plainly states they found no documentary or testimonial evidence that prove his motives were political but then neither do they attempt to show what his motives were otherwise. The most likely reason is like the prosecution, IG is under no obligation to prove motive just illegal actions, and they did. What Comey's reasons were at the time of his insubordination and improper considerations is still a big unknown. Why? I'll say it again, because IG found no documentary or testimonial evidence to present which proves one way or another what goes on in another mans mind. Furthermore I don't believe they under any obligation to do so and what bothers me is why they even brought it up to begin with! But that's up to the next public boondoggle to decide.
Who was Comey's 'Higher Authority'?