Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scandium
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scandium
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
|
I'm not sure what your point here is with the link to paid right- wing shill Michelle Malkin. |
LOL! Someone is paid and they become a shill. Oh, they're right-wing, so it's OK. |
They're a shill if they consistently promote the ideology of only one political spectrum while attacking/undermining the other and making a living doing it. |
Why?
shill ( P ) Pronunciation Key (shl) Slang
n.
One who poses as a satisfied customer or an enthusiastic gambler to dupe bystanders into participating in a swindle.
This belongs on a separate thread but I asked you before to show us her deceptions.
Quote:
|
That about describes Malkin to a tee. She's a "right-wing" shill because she consistently promotes right-wing ideology while attacking the left-wing. If she were doing the reverse she would be a left-wing shill, but then you wouldn't be posting her commentary here, would you?
|
This does not define a shill. It defines an idealist or possibly an idealogue.
Quote:
Quote:
|
And my point was that numerous people exist with all sorts of beliefs but that doesn't mean they have established foundations backing them up.
|
As you linked Malkin's commentary on Gore's global warming documentary to this point you really have me confused now. Are you suggesting global warming doesn't exist and comparing Gore's documentary on it to christianity?
|
Something strange going on here. My link is to an article titled Eco-Terrorism 101. Watch the movie.
And the point was that there are lots of people with personal beliefs that violence is a legitimate means to achieve an end. Some people base themselves on their own decisions of right and wrong, others on what is dictated to them.