View Single Post
Old 05-06-18, 06:28 PM   #6
Gray Lensman
Frogman
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 308
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewy1 View Post
G'day guys,

<cut>

(I've modified my Sonar Values so that both the Sturgeon Long and Akula 1 are at 55)

I'm no expert by any means - but do you have other 'David and Goliath' stories?

Cheers,
Stew
Quote:
Originally Posted by p7p8 View Post
Original (in RA) passive sonar sound level is 60 for both subs. You decreased it to 55 which is close to Seawolf level (54) without any good reasons.
In other hand passive sonar sound level is NOT always noise at 0 kts speed because there is also "propulsion factor".

This is noise comparison:



About David & Goliath:

Sturgeon long have much better and faster torpedoes (from mid 80'):

Mk48mod4 - active/passive wireguided - range 17 NM*
vs
USET-80 - active/passive (without wire guiding) range 7.3 NM*
TEST-71M - active/passive wireguided - range 8.1 NM*

(* at max speed)

Sturgeon have much better TA (definatelly not from 1971 but from late 80' or mid 90'):
maximum detection sensivity at speed 14

Akula I TA:
maximum detection sensivity at speed 8

...and you lower passive noise of both subs, so Akula havent chance to detect you at good range for SUBROC engaging.

I think in this duel - you were Goliath
Try the same in Akula I vs Sturgeon long - im sure tis will be much harder mission for you.
I certainly wouldn't have bragged about bagging an Akula with modified files. Gotta agree... It was Sturgeon (Goliath) vs Akula (David)!
__________________
.

Member since February 2007

Wargaming since 1971 (1st game Avalon Hill's Stalingrad)

Hobby/Gaming Computng since 1977 (TRS-80) (adhoc programming & game modding ever since)
Gray Lensman is offline   Reply With Quote