Some more information
As mentioned earlier the prosecutor had called an expert on Submarines Ditte Dyreborg.
Yesterday she was called into the witness stand
Here is from what have been said during her testimony
(have used google translate)
It was not the exhaust that killed the Swedish journalist, says the prosecutor's expert witness, contradicting the statement of the submarine captain.
Commander and expert on submarines do not believe that Kim Wall died of exhaust gases.
Today's main witness in the case of the Swedish journalist's death is the commander and submarine expert Ditte Dyrborg from the Navy naval station in Korsor.
Even when the submarine disappeared in August last year, she became involved in the search. The first reaction of the Commander, was that a submarine would not sink as fast as it did in the case of Nautilus.
She was sent to Dragør, where the submarine landed. The witness then spoke with some officers and pointed out that she already assumed that it was a deliberate sinking.
The reduction was later recognized by the accused submarine.
Did not track too much carbon monoxide
Commander and trained engineer, was also involved in the raising of the submarine and conducted measurements on board when the vessel was emptied of water. The measurements took place with equipment from Naval Station Korsor.
She explained in court that it would be possible to find carbon monoxide in the vessel's air reservoir if there had been an exhaust gas in the submarine, as the defendant has explained.
That led to the death of the Swedish journalist Kim Walls, the defendant himself explained on 14 October.
But there was no carbon black to register:
"It can be measured in very small concentrations, but we could not find anything"
The prosecutor would know whether the time difference between August 11 and the time when the measurements were made in October after the accused's new explanations have any significance?
"It does not matter. For the air that was measured in the reservoir was from that day, "the shipwreck replied, there was also no fault on the exhaust system in the vessel.
Do not believe the accused's explanation
The accused submarine explained that there was a mistake on the exhaust that led exhaust gases into the vessel.
"Do you think that Kim Wall should have been locked in the submarine because of oppression and got exhaust gases in it?", The prosecutor asks.
"No, I do not believe it".
Commander Ditte Dyrborg does not believe that the accused submarine driver would be able to open the submarine's hatch from the outside, such as the accused have explained.
She has delivered three reports to the police investigation. According to them, it is considered impossible to open a hatch by hand alone, when there is negative pressure in the vessels caused by the exhaust gases.
"If the engines running, you should be able to lift 525 kg plus the hatch weight. It's after a minute '.
Shouted through the hull
The defendant has previously explained that he does not know why the engines in the vessel stopped but thought he was yelling at Kim Wall in the submarine that she should stop the engines.
The commander, does not believe that it has been possible at the time.
"There are two engines and noise, and there is a thick hull. I do not think you could shout someone up. I do not think you could have closed the engines unless you were instructed in it "
(End of article)
Here are the whole article in Danish
https://politiken.dk/indland/art6413...B8dningsgasser
Markus