03-07-18, 08:25 AM
|
#4366
|
|
Old enough to know better
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Prince Edward Island
Posts: 11,749
Downloads: 136
Uploads: 0
|
A little bit of criticism about Jane Mayer's recent article on Christopher Steele in The New Yorker. It's aptly titled "Jane Mayer’s Publicity Work for Christopher Steele".
https://spectator.org/jane-mayers-pu...topher-steele/
Quote:
|
Jane Mayer’s long, lionizing profile of Christopher Steele, the former British spy the Democrats hired to dig up dirt on Donald Trump, is propaganda for the ruling class, premised on its usual double standards and appeals to its own authority. For those who bother to slog through the piece, they will need an interpretive key, which is: if a liberal conducts political espionage, it can’t be partisan and wrong.
|
__________________
“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”
― Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|