Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna
Kind of confused about your response; I did not say the customer has an absolute right of expectation from the seller; to the contrary, I stated there is no such thing as an absolute right of any kind. As I also stated, I am of two minds on the matter as the exact line of demarcation of rights in this matter is vague and motile. I have not taken a definitive stand either way...
Show me where, in my post you refer to, did I explicitly say, or claim, in any way, a seller "has to make a deal ..., here, now". You are arguing about statements never made and never even intimated; you are arguing a fallacy and untruth; all in all, I'd say your umbrage is, well...
...absurd... 
<O> |
You said you were of two minds over an issue, and I tried to describe that I think your position is self-contradictory there. There is no reason and argument supporting to be indifferent. So I described how crystal-clear the moral/legal situation imo really is: nobody can ever own somebody else and demand that the other must be up to his service (if he has not accepted payment in advance). It leaves no room for indifference, that profound I see my argument on that nobody has claim for somebody else's existence and that nobody has to live for the sake of somebody else.