[Rockin Robbins]

No, I'm stuck on your statement that all you have to do is have enemy speed and torpedo speed to hit your target. After you say that, no You Tube videos or other explanation matters.

You still haven't supported your foundational statement and until you do your Videos are really don't matter. Anybody can set up a canned situation fire blindly and hit in a You Tube video. It doesn't prove a thing. That's what the other deranged guy did with his 80-10 farce. Had dozens of videos up there that proved nothing. Claimed he never missed. Didn't have a targeting method at all. He could sink 'em in his videos though, just like you. It's a shame his targeting method was trash and not one single Subsim member profited from the prophet.

Have you bothered to check out a single thing I've been telling you about? Or are you just focused on being the Apostle of the New Way? Have you found a way to violate the laws of geometry? Without geometry there is no trigonometry, which is only analytical geometry. When the geometric base is fallacy, the trig is misapplied.

Final thought. There is a difference between empty bragging and instruction. Nobody ever learned a thing from empty bragging. The appearance of knowledge is not the same as knowledge. Understand the Dick O'Kane method. Understand the vector analysis method. Understand my paragraph about how to define a triangle and its application to your foundational statement that you can define a triangle by only specifying two sides alone. Fix your method. Quit defending fallacy and ask for help and I'll be glad to get you on solid ground, but you aren't ready for that. You Tube videos of booms won't do the job.

I'll give you until tomorrow morning and then I'll go with exposing the problems of your method. It'll be very simple graphical representation that will be self-validating and everyone will agree with. Except, presumably, you. That doesn't matter. I'm here to warn off the newbies.