I can see using NK as a parallel to former Nazi-Germany was a in a way wrong-Why I picked NK, was due to what some of you have written about NK in our thread about NK and what I have read, seen and heard on news and documentary about NK.
I think Eichhörnchen is or could be right in his statement.
The problem is, none of us really know-´cause it's a alternative history that didn't happened-We can only speculate.
Therefore, any statement what would happen in Germany from June 1939 and forward(alternative history line starts) and how the other countries(those who was directly or indirectly part of the WWII-from the correct history line)acted according to Germany, if they stayed home and minded their own business, can be seen as valid
Maybe there wouldn't be a WWII as we know it or there would be a regional war.
Maybe WWII started 5-10 years later, but without Germany as the one who starts the war but maybe get involved in one way or other.
The Second question I also ask myself is-as part of this What-If Germany... would any of these technical invention that came due to the war have happened any way, but some year later or would we still today be flying in plane without jet engine and still using propel....
(I know this was somehow of topic)
Markus
|