Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgard
it was a questimate based on the Mk-16.
In final run to a surface target while active. Why didn't you just say so if your experience said otherwise?
I don't doubt what I saw, but the education is good, too.
Apparently the question about what FLT II meant was...,
|
I only agreed with you on the behavior that you reported on the original post for the MK-48. I asked the first question on the FLT II because your response (FLT II) did not have any meaning. There was no context in your answer.
The developers can only write code on what little information they are able to glean from the internet and speaking to individuals in the know. Since almost all information concerning the MK-48 is classified, I would assume they just thought to use the running characteristics of the MK-16. I do not really have an issue with the observed camera behavior since it appears not to have any negative impact on weapon performance.
There are several of us on here (either active duty or retired) that are attempting to correct fallacies and educate others but keep within the boundaries of the security classification of the subject.