Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Let me put it this way. Either this manual control (and also, the requirement you read the screen) is putting significant stress on your cognitive faculties or it isn't. If it is (and your wording so far implies such to me), then it is by design, is (IMO) healthy, and certainly not a basis for saying the product is unfinished.
And if it isn't a significant congitive load, is there really anything complaining about? You call a game "unfinished" because of a supposed flaw that only caused an insignificant cognitive load on you in any case?
|
Seriously.
What is wrong with you?
Is my English that bad, that insufficient?
Do I fail so badly to bring my points across that I have to explain them to you like I would to a child, and still have to repeat myself multiple times?
Because I start to wonder what else I can do here.
Because I am a well meaning soul though, I will try just one more time, because you seem to be special:
I dislike being forced, without an alternative, to manual controls, because this game said to put you in the position and role of the captain - not a helmsman, diving officer and planesman.
To be
able to drive manually, is super cool! The more, the merrier!
To be
forced to do it, instead of doing it realistically by giving orders to your crew, is not.
Now, is this opinion of mine acceptable for you?
Stop being ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
To this reader, though you did not admit it directly, that's threatening.
|
There was nothing to "admit", as there was no threat at all.
Stop making assumptions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
What you probably really wanted to do here is do things "right" and make a proper TMA solution before shooting.
|
No, what I wanted is a nice game, what I got were pings at max selected range doing 5kts (ambush as usual),
seconds after being ingame.
I didn't even have time to cycle through the already detected contacts until the first ping went off.
TMA? What for in this underwater-shooter?
Also, to further point out your annoying, nonsensical and inflammatory behavior of consistently
assuming things about people instead of simply addressing what they
actually said can be very well seen in this very example.
You even quoted the very post where I said:
Quote:
|
However, since sending a fish down the first active-intercept bearing is enough in CW in very most cases, it doesn't even matter.
|
Yeah, probably
"because I tried to do TMA".
Stop making assumptions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
But because of their aggressive use of active sonar, you did not feel safe doing that, so instead you flip off fish at the pings.
|
Uh, yeah, because enemy submarines are so very dangerous in Cold Waters...
See above to learn why I send a fish down the bearing immediately.
Oh and:
Stop making assumptions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
While that does work due to the Mark 48's excellence, the relatively close ranges, and their evasion technique not being all that it could be, it still forced you to adapt to it, and I think it is only sporting to admit to that.
|
What are you even talking about? 
The enemy gave me his bearing instantly and committed suicide because all I had to do was to send a Mk48 down-bearing and hit time compression so I can get on with the campaign already.
Uhhh, boy did Ivan "force me big time to play his game", sitting on the bottom of the Norwegian Sea, his lungs filled with salt water, his eyes open, staring into the darkness...
Meanwhile I received medals and was declared a "war hero" days later.
Again:
Stop making assumptions.
You're still doing the same mistake: You are not addressing any of my arguments and points, you ignore them and pull wild assumptions out of your behind because otherwise your "arguments" go *poof!*.
Stop that.
Now, a pinging sub
in this game is everything but "threatening".
They ping so often, I started to ignore it.
I argued that this makes it EASIER for the player, as all you need to do is to send a torpedo down the active-intercept bearing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
(no more saying he was unprovoked)
|
Ok, this is where it ends and where I will call for moderation to step in.
I do not need you to tell me what I can say and what not, nor will I further tolerate your incredibly inflammatory and slandering behavior, now even implying that I am a liar.It is pointless to continue this, as you still do not address what I said, but simply form your own little version of what people say and then go by that. I have to admit though, this is somewhat mind-blowing.
