Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
That will not stop of course those who still see him as the messiah reincarnated on Earth
|
Dude why is it that you never seem to be able to make a statement without attempting to precast and vilify anyone who might possibly hold a different opinion than you? I mean it's your second sentence. What chance do you think you have of getting the proper debate that you claim to seek if you poison the waters of discourse so early on before anyone has a chance to even read the body of what you write?
Quote:
I did not say the made claims, I said she claims, in the meaning of making claim for something. If I messed up correct language here I'm sorry, if not, my reply to your question would be the problem is that she is in a position where she she should not be, seems to claim in all naturalness responsiblities that she should be banned to have, claims access to secret information she is not legitimised to get, and in general simply is in a place where she ought to have no business to do. None of his family should have any position in his government, since all his children have private business interests that should automatically ban them from holding any positions in the government club. This all is as classic a conflict of interests as "classic" can mean. That Trump calls them in, is nepotism. What they perfom, is dynastic politics. They have to leave, unconditionally. And Trump should have sold his own businesses not to his family that he now includes in the government, but to third parties.
|
I'm not sure where in the US constitution it says that a person must liquidate all their their personal assets before assuming the office of the president nor do I recall it saying that family members are prohibited from seeing/talking to him about what they want pretty much whenever they want.
Because of the familial access they have to the president a security clearance is given to every member of his immediate family including little children. That does not mean however they have the right to demand (or claim) access to classified information and it's not correct to imply that it does. It just allows them to move without escort in areas of the White House not open to the public.