Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna
Also, in all the links you posted, there is not a single one specifically stating there was factual, verifiable support to Trump's charge Obama personally and specifically ordered any wiretapping of Trump for politically motivated purposes. All those links own titles have nothing to do with Trump's trumped-up charges. Got any links from news sources with actual named sources to back up Trump's claims?...
|
That is just the typical double standard the "Left" uses.
for close to one year, Democrats and the MSM have been trying to claim that there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet after all that time, all they can show are innuendos, weak circumstantial evidence and claims made by anonymous sources. There is still not one piece of hard evidence showing any "collusion". Yet that has not stopped Liberals from demanding a special prosecutor and further investigation.
Yet when the NY Times and the BBC both report, based on the same anonymous sources behind the Russia fable, that the Obama administration was spying/wiretapping the Trump campaign, the left insists on seeing immediate and irrefutable proof.
Either both the Trump-Russia collusion story and the Obama spying story are equally plausible and both should be thoroughly investigated or both are crap and should be dropped.
You guys can't keep sucking and blowing at the same time.