Did anyone else happen to note the Breitbart reports regarding the alleged wiretapping of Trump by the Obama White House attributes their 'facts' to anonymous, unnamed sources? You would think any really responsible journalist seeking to tell the truth would be willing to identify their sources; otherwise, this is probably all "fake news". Don't think so? Well, a person known for his 'wisdom' and 'honesty' actually came out and insisted only news reports specifying the sources are the only real news and no journalist and/or news outlet should be able to get away with anonymous sources; and, you know that person's views must be the truth because it was reported by Breitbart:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/...-news-network/
Also, does anybody else think it seems oddly coincidental that when Trump dug himself an embarrassingly deep hole with his tweets about the alleged wiretapping and he desperately needed a diversion, suddenly Wiki Leaks releases a huge trove of hacked material? How very convenient, no?...
Altogether now: "deflect, deflect, deflect..."...
<O>