Hello again,
sorry for being late, i did not want to place my post here and run away, just too much to do yesterday.
@Jim Yes, good riddance of course, the random slaughter of innocent and children makes all this talk of terrorists of being "righteous" or "for Allah" completely futile. Taking hostages is the lowest form to prove anything.
@Bilge rat: Yes, meanwhile i think you are right. Even i am becoming tired lately of excusing anything again and again, when there is no excuse. I had just read about the terrorist's family and how they stated that he had changed after his 1 1/2 years (not 15) at Guantanamo, but that they never would have expected him to do this. They obviously never thought that he might have just been lying.
It is difficult enough to spot terrorists, let alone arresting them in time, before committing something. This is really a problem, in our "enlightened" constitutions someone has to act before we can act, so how can we prove that he is up to something illegal before he does it. Finding explosives at suspects' homes is hint enough, but not all do this at home.
I can also not understand how this "radicalisation" works. Had he committed his deed right after Guantanamo, there could have had been at least some explanation, but he did it ten years later after founding a family. WTF??
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong.
|