Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Wait wait wait. Back up a little bit. In your last post you took offense because I said, and I quote:
You got angry and said:
So I ask what he did, and you reply that it's what he said before the election and since he's been in office. That's not me telling you what you said, it's what you actually said. Oh, and I never said your opinion is unjustified, or that you feel something you don't. What I said was that your hatred, but your own admission, is based on what he said, not on what he did. That's okay too, but you insist that it's what he did.
So I ask again, what has he actually done that's got you so worked up?
|
Why is it so difficult?
I took offense because instead of accepting that for some people what he IS is already enough to build an opinion, irrelevant to what he did or will do in the coming years, you simply claimed to know what I base my opinion on - despite me having said that clearly already. What's the point of this?
And what do you want to hear, what do you mean "What had he done?" isn't what he said and did over the last year enough already? Does there really need to be more even?
Where's the line when one's allowed to judge him in your opinion?