Quote:
Originally Posted by Wamiduku
That was the French way, of course. Syria wasn't independent until 1946.
|
The camps were operated until 1949 afair. We'll see...
EDIT: Ok - in the article itself - an Egypt camp until 1948. Checking for Syrian data...
Edit: My UN site - as useful as ever
https://search.archives.un.org/middl...y-unrra-policy
Some Google books scans
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...B3DC4Q6AEIKTAG
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...B3DC4Q6AEILzAI
Can't find my nurse.
El Shatt - Egypt - with links (my Wikipedia link! - the article history goes to 2009)
https://www.geni.com/projects/El-Sha...gee-camps/1065
Still nothing useful for Syria - the camp was at Aleppo.
The Washington Post has adopted the topic too now - and links to an site with Polish refugees in Iran. No cross reference, no back up...
https://www.library.cornell.edu/coll...st/polsirn.htm
I think this is what one has to do with information provided by the media priests. Check and crosscheck the data - don't trust the media priest per se. Some common sense is helpful. Europeean refugees in Syria sounds strange at first, but considering that some population tends to flee the violence - where should they have fled to? Who has an agenda here? Follow the money is a standard principle.
Edit: Is your question answered, Dowly?
I try to get some sleep now. CU