Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippelspanner
And who here said that or even remotely suggested that?
No one. Absolutely no one.
Can you at least try to make a valid point for once instead of resting your argument on things no one here said?
|
We shall listen to the media priests - link thier motivation to control our perception.
Your opinion is from priest A - writing in media “True”. You link the text to support your opinion - his opinion, his processed data, his motivation to see the world - you have accepted this opinion.
I do the same - link my motivator. I shall read yours, you shall read mine.
I don't think this kind of discussion to be useful. Let the media priests have that discussion by themselves. They don't need us for that.
The cleric priests explaining the world with the Bible has lost influence.
You don't listen to them.
But the media priests explaining the world with news and data have gained influence. You totally believe them. Muslims are all evil terrorists - you link to their hatemonger.
What's not written in the news is not true! = What's not written in the Bible is not true.
In the same tone you address me: please, for once, try to keep up and use your intelligence. Don't tell me I overestimate it.
And now please tell me, is this tone necessary and productive? Does it add to the discussion?