[Skybird]

Most of those Muslims attacking London and Madrid years ago, had good job outlooks, were educated, some had academic training, were upper middle class, had good future outlook, seemed to have been "integrated", had friends. They failed the profiles of terrorist schemes the police until then believed would help to identify them as terrorists.

Ideology means a set of concepts that builds motivational power with inherent self-dynamics. It does not depend on external factors, it is the driving force for itself. This means ideology must not be a reaction to external factors. It still can form up and manifest itself even when all external factors are against it.

Thats why I love religious ideologies so much. They make people believe they do something good when actually they commit the utmost cruel and barbaric acts and atrocities.

The old thinking of that it needs social circumstances of poverty and misery to form a Muslim terrorist (also maybe that such a "terrorist" is just somebody else's freedom fighter), are outdated and probably were misled from all beginning on. Its a thought reflex to avoid realising unwanted truths. Mind you, Islam is d death cult, where as people in the West get raised in belief of that individual life is precious. But for a cult that from all beginning on has glorified martyrdom to breed more fearless figthers for the wars to come, this recognition of individual life is pointless.

Certain cultural petrified structures and tradition that even forego Islam and Muhammad, also play a role here.

The attacker yesterday, lived with a foster family, so there were well-meaning people around him who let him live in their own home and family, voluntarily, which says something about the attitude of these people. They hardly met him with hostility or in a non-caring kind of attitude.