Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Wallace
I'm thinking this piece of legislation is not an attempt to prevent people from conversing in a bar or other public places in the furtherance of making contacts or new friends. I'm thinking this is to give women some added protection with regards to men being aggressive in an overtly sexual manner.
|
I neither said nor implied it is a law to prevent people conversing in a bar. It simply is a badly-made law stitched with with hot needles, an actionistic attempt of politicians to react to the events from Cologne. This law was under dispute already before Cologne, and many delayed it, because it was so ideological questionable. After Cologne, these doubts have been thrown out of the window. Politicians want to show that they "do somethign about it".
For radicla feminists, who already yell "sexual discrimination!" when a man holds a door open for a woman, it is a big victory, for it allows that males in principle can be sued for any initiative they show by now, even if it includes no aggression at all. If pushing it to the point, males are demanded to be totally passive and submissive now, leaving every initiative and every first step to the dominant female. That is feminst paradise!
A law should not allow loopholes that can be abused for such dubious things, if a law includes such loopholes,
it is a sign that it simply is a badly-made law.
And we know how it goes. Where abuse is possible, abuse will manifest itself sooner or later.