SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Skybird · 06-11-16, 05:07 AM

Alienating result yesterday, France-Romania, because the 1:0 was after the French attacker fouled the Romanian keeper (very hard to see, but decisive action), and the penalty was unjustified: the Romanian attacker before again had committed a foul the ref did not see.

The match was so-la-la, a draw would have been fairer, me thinks.

Video evidence form next tournament on. Many many years too late. It works in American sport leagues so well, is a sign for fairness and professionalism. The opening match of a tournament: and two of three scored goals were due to misjudgements by the referee: how could traditionalists defend that with "sportsmanship" and "spirit of the game"? At least the two mistakes neutralised each other, without these goals, the win still would have been France.

06-11-16, 05:07 AM	#9
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,709 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Alienating result yesterday, France-Romania, because the 1:0 was after the French attacker fouled the Romanian keeper (very hard to see, but decisive action), and the penalty was unjustified: the Romanian attacker before again had committed a foul the ref did not see. The match was so-la-la, a draw would have been fairer, me thinks. Video evidence form next tournament on. Many many years too late. It works in American sport leagues so well, is a sign for fairness and professionalism. The opening match of a tournament: and two of three scored goals were due to misjudgements by the referee: how could traditionalists defend that with "sportsmanship" and "spirit of the game"? At least the two mistakes neutralised each other, without these goals, the win still would have been France. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.