Can't wait LuftWolf. Things keep getting better and better.
With the simulation representing more and more plausible system performances its really gathering the feel of warfare that one would expect. Like with the Aegis systems performing like they do I can now understand why some reports say that RL subs don't bother to carry many ASM missiles anymore, if AAW systems are advanced as they seem in-game those are like impenetrable walls.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaHuJa
I haven't used the UUV in active mode since... well... I sorta just know I have at some time, but by what I can tell that may as well have been with SC...
|
Good question. I haven't used the active UUV mode in forever as well.... wonder how good it is anyway? Does anyone know the expected detection ranges of its active mode? One could probably suspect a similar range to a torp active sonar. And with more range (like 35-45nm) it might be a more suitable anti-mine platform... perhaps anyway.
Random Question: How do we feel about the theoretical performance of ground based SAM and AAW? One would expect that the more in trench SAM (guarding airways, bases, etc) would have comparable performance to a ship-born aegis right? The issue might surface with strike mission in which strike targets supposedly heavily defended aren't really shooting many missiles... :hmm: Could it be as simple as assigning Aegis stats to the SAM sensors and giveing them the CIWS doctrine?