The next nominee needs to have a record reflecting this, the only truly legitimate view of the constitution.
"That’s the argument of flexibility and it goes something like this: The Constitution is over 200 years old and societies change. It has to change with society, like a living organism, or it will become brittle and break. But you would have to be an idiot to believe that. The Constitution is not a living organism, it is a legal document. It says something and doesn’t say other things." -Antonin Scalia
Promise you not one person Obama would consider nominating holds this legitimate view, the way the founders looked at it and meant for it to be interpreted. Instead, he will nominate some "living" constitution moron who will "find" things that do not exist to justify their agenda.
For that reason and that reason only, I am okay with them not confirming whatever pseudo marxist, anti white(Sotomayor for example) , class warrior who will subvert our rights even more.
Obama has shown can not be trusted.
Should Hillary or Bernie win, well guess will be stuck but hopefully Trump or Cruz are in and will nominate a real Justice.
|