My take:
- one of the core European ideals is the rule of law.
As such, you have to prosecute any criminals for the crimes that they have commited. The core problem is not that imigrants may or may not commit crimes, but that:
- you have an increase in crime levels.
- a lot of those crimes appear to be conducted by a group (of people), making prosecution difficult (because you have to prove that they have done it as a group).
And so the problem is manageable with the apropriate resource allocation.
Thus the question is not as much in terms of removing evill kebab, but in how much resources wise you are willing to spend on the altruistic mission of reforming and integrating all those refugees and imigrants. If you do not plan to keep them, but rather to provide temporary shelter, then you should go for filtration and refugee camps.
If you do plan to keep them, then you need to calculate how much you could take and instigate controls after that quota is filled.
__________________
Grumpy as always.
|