Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bradclark1
My thoughts on tactical nuclear weapons is that if once used it will be put on table as an acceptable weapon from then on. That opens up a window to hell.
|
Sounds like someone is willing to see how far one can go before being retaliated against. Sounds like 1939. Iran might become an ally to China and then it will be either no way back or pack your GIs and go home scenarios.
Lately I've seen a spur of publicaions that talk about
:
1. Ability of USA to withstand a retaliating nuclear atttack (bull****)
2. US having nuclear weapons that destroy things without contamination in mass scale (hence making it ok to use...)
3. US slowly making a push towards the war and again preparing ground for 'if you are not with us, you are against us scenario'
4. Stating flatly that one of its enemies in long run is China
5. Superiority of US nuclear arms to that of Russia and China
6. Hollywood too prepares us for world end.
I hope the protests withing the US "democracy" will gather power like during Vietnam and will withdraw troops from the Gulf before the country ends up like the Roman Empire but with much more deaths.
But it seems that the Americans decided a while ago that a nuclear scenario has to be tested now on Iran in order to control China and Russia in the future. And the people in the "democracy" have absolutely no control over it. China is not Russia. China can actually retaliate. US people should think about that next time they vote a president.
I believe you posted a wrong pic by mistake.
