Regarding the legal aspects of this decision and a few of the other more recent decisions, one thread has run through all: the Constitution, as it now stands does allow for this decision and the others. If the Right really wants to change or preserve certain aspects of what they view as correct, they should then push to change the Constitution. However, they know they stand very, very little chance of ever getting a sufficient number of votes in the House or Senate to pass legislation to put those amendments to the Constitution before the states for ratification, much less getting three-fourths of the states to approve their ratification. So, they revert to filing endless lawsuits in a Quixotic quest to enforce their narrow 'moralities' on the larger population, in general. The really said thing for them is, in pursuing their lawsuits, the inevitable decisions only serve to further diminish any sway they might have and further push away their goals...
<O>
__________________
__________________________________________________ __
|