Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippelspanner
Where did I claim it is the same thing?
I merely noted that they rely on the same principles.
|
I've never questioned the Principles.
I'm merely trying to point out that one could've been easily avoided whilst the other couldn't.
Quote:
The first part is right - you're responsible for your privacy, as for what YOU make public and what not - but not what others, partner or not, do with it.
If they invade/harm your privacy, they commit a crime, not you.
You again shove responsibility for a crime upon the victim, which isn't right.
|
None would have happened to you if they didn't make them.
What, you tell people that haven't locked their houses when they leave that it wasn't their responsibility either after it has been robbed empty too?
Also I'm not shoving the crime in their boots nor am I'm talking the crime right, I'm merely questioning their sense of responsibility and precautions they didn't took. If you allow your partner to take nude shots of you, on his mobile/camera and in his safekeeping you're a fool.
Quote:
So?
There are a lot of campaigns for or against a lot of things by lots of people/organizations/political parties - doesn't make it right though.
What's wrong with making pictures like that for whatever private purpose?
Nothing.
The illegal publication is the problem.
|
Problem is that this digital footprint is hard to erase, once it is on the web it's not going to come of. Ofcourse there is no problem in taking the pictures but there is without thinking ahead of things that might happen to them....and if you don't like the idea if you give it a bit of thought...then don't take them.
Quote:
|
It is the very same fallacy as to tell a girl not to dress 'sexy' to prevent being raped/abused.
|
If nudy shots aren't taken then none can be published thus it does prevent.
Quote:
|
No one is talking about the fact that these kind of pictures have been taken - but published without the OK of the owner/person who's privacy is going to be invaded (and possibly a life destroyed).
|
No one is talking but it should be noted that it all could've been easily prevented, the guy would never be able to make money out of it, the pethathic uploader wouldn't have had his pethatic revenge and her life was all peachy.
Quote:
|
I can make as many dirty pictures with my girl as we want to but that doesn't mean I am allowed to publish them.
|
No, but still I'd say it's foolish to create them in the first place if one is worried.