View Single Post
Old 12-31-14, 04:32 PM   #14
Armistead
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: on the Dan
Posts: 10,880
Downloads: 364
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post

Sorry Armistead, but that simply contains far too many factual errors.
Any of the future States militia acts prove it to not be the case.
Not if you look into the original intent of militias at the time and the fact all people basically had guns. Yes, state laws, ratifications, evolution of legalities have argued and changed through history, but the original intent were people could be armed was never in question and if needed, form their own militias to fight against future tyranny. Course, back then they all carried muskets.

The question is now and the future, with so much change, do we continue to stick and fight for the 2nd amend in it's original intent -NRA-. Obvious, we've changed a lot from that as is...and I'm sure we'll see more changes/ratifications in the future....
__________________

You see my dog don't like people laughing. He gets the crazy idea you're laughing at him. Now if you apologize like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.
Armistead is offline   Reply With Quote