Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
I cannot speak for Oberon, but I can make a guess and say that he brings it up,
because the reason behind the 2nd Amendment was to have the capability for
civilian population to fight against a tyrannical government or defend the state against foreign enemy.
AR-15 doesn't do much against a government nor foreign enemy who has tanks, planes, helos, artillery etc. on it's side.
Again, this is just my guess as to why Oberon posted it.
Might want to wait for his own input on the matter.  |
Depends...what warfare you are talking about.
AK 47 does the job for Taliban for example....
The philosophy behind 2 amendment is fine in my opinion , it is better to have some alternative to fight than none.
The debate is whether this philosophy right/freedom is worth the price , I think.