The only real problem here that I see is the ideological one.
Ie, does the US have the right to selectively enforce it's ideals onto the other states? Or even not enforce those ideals, but use the enforcement of those ideals as an excuse for major geopolitical (often armed) intervention?
Interestingly enough only now does the ICC begin to look into the whole Afghanistan (and US war on terror in general) mess, not that there would be a proper investigation or anything (as per letter of International Law half of the world's leading politicians could be found guilty of some crime against peace or humanity if one looks well enough).
|