Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat
Ikalugin,
so you are claiming that it is perfectly legitimate for:
1) one country to invade another country;
2) immediately hold a referendum;
3) announce that it "won" the referendum without any independent verification or observers;
4) annex the part of the country it invaded.
Could you please point out what part of international law allows that sort of behavior, I seemed to have missed that part.
|
I did not claim that. In fact I have claimed something completely different, now it appears that there is a degree of misunderstanding here. Would it help if I clarify my position again, quite possibly countering those 5 points?