Well, ikalugin, i'm afraid that if you need the Nuremberg trials to decide for you the difference btw a German and nazi then i don't really know what else to say to you.
Revionist?
No revision there, of course you will defend your illutrious leader to the hilt, because most Russians to this day do so, saying that Stalin was 1 of the best leaders the country ever had.
Of course, because to deport so many ethnic groups to the gulags and concentration camps, he needed a lot of servants for that.
His fingers reach far and wide, even to this day there would be relatives of relatives that had relatives who did his genocidal bidding.
Seriously if you keep exhonerating him and saying he wasn't as bad as Hitler then i'm afraid the we have nothing left to discuss.
Especially since you don't want to see the truth and call it revisionism
Typical.
I don't have an issue with my heritage.
It seems you need to revise your countrie's history a bit more, especially that of your nobel piece price nominee.
If that doesn't give anyone a clue as to how farcical and fabricated and fantastical some of this allied ww2 saga is then i really don't know.
And this 90% thing, you can have that if you want. If it makes you sleep better at night.
Still doesn't change anything about Stalin or the things i told you to look up, which you conveniently call revionism.
Newsflash my friend, Russia in 1990, yes it took them that long, admitted guilt to Katyn massacre, after trying to pin it on the Nazis.
Funny stuff really.
But of course we both know that Katyb was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
We both know it, others know it.
Stalin knew it.