Quote:
Originally Posted by makman94
as i allready told the 16 km 3d models(tested NYGM enviro,GWX 16km enviro ,OLC mkiid 16 km enviro and MEP v2.1 enviro) also have the discussed 'problem' (as the 20 km models as well). did you check the 16 km models and you find them ok ?
|
Yes, I suspected that the models of GWX could cause the same problem, but since my expanded model solved the problem, I have not checked this possibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by makman94
the models in v4 has the abillity to reach visuals at about 26250m(!) by simply enlarging the fog and clouds models. i reduced the fog to this specific diameter becuase i noticed at my tests that if ship is at greater than 20 km distance is very hard for our eyes to see it through an x7 zoom at binoculars or uzo so i made my mind back then to set the fog there.
|
So, you don't need to change sensors' parameters if the fog's model is enlarged !
Quote:
Originally Posted by makman94
in your tests, you found out that a +20% at fog's height is enough to cover the issue ?
|
My fog's model was not +20% but only +20 (with Wings 3D 1.5.2). In fact, with my tests, the mountain was not totally covered, but almost. Here's a picture so you can make the comparison (height is given by the Mission Editor) :
Regards