Quote:
Originally Posted by MH
Exactly how it should be.
We are not talking about some home made warhead here right?
Also the two plane theory shooting at the cockpit makes no sense at all.
We have also the one about air to air missile and then two planes shooting the cockpit...more nonsense it seems.
As long as it involves cover ups and CIA in it why not.....
|
A fragmentation warhead is not to be compared to a shotgun cartridge filled with 20 tiny bullets all of the same size and with, but the fragmentation pattern and size of fragmentation of the solid warhead cannot be predicted, like in an exploding handgrenaded. At best you have assembled it in such a way that there are wanted rated break points, but even then you have a random generation of unpredictability to which degree each fragment follows that wanted breaking line, or is shorter or larger.
Huge variety in
entry openings thus speaks for a fragmentation warhead exploding outside, less variety speaks for individual projectiles.
The huge variety speaking for randomly formed fragments you see in the
exit openings.
Conclusion: projectiles entered the cockpit from the outside. In the cockpit stuff exploded. Fragments from the blast existed the cockpit.
Also, a fragmentation warhead exploding should have showered more parts of the aircraft with shrapnels and fragments, not just the cockpit. And how is it that there are shrapnels from TWO sides entering the cockpit - because on
both sides of the cockpit they said the metal walls shows entry openings (I do not mean the two sides of one sheet of metal, but the walls of the cockpit, the left wall and the right wall). Thea also said that the rest of the plane'S framework does in no way show a comparable amount of destruction from outside force. With a cannon you can aim at certain subsections of a plane, like for example the cockpit. With a ground-controlled long distance SAM - you cannot, you just aim for a blip on a screen and hope the best.