Quote:
Originally Posted by guntherprien
I don't recall inviting you into this conversation.
|
It's an open internet forum. Did someone invite you to post in the first place? Anyone can say anything they want, as long as they don't violate the forum rules.
Quote:
Don't be so rude.
Have some manners instead of jumping into a full frontal attack,I know you're only trying to bolster your pal's response,but a little decorum goes a long way.
|
How exactly was I rude? By posting a response on a forum?
Quote:
|
All I'm asking is for people to think outside of the box,instead of believing everything they hear.
|
You did much more than that. You said flat out that the government knows exactly where the plane is but is covering it up.
Quote:
|
A disappearance of this magnitude is unprecedented,my source says there is more to it than meets the eye (which is obvious).
|
Your unnamed source known only to you. Again, why should anyone believe you on your word alone?
Quote:
|
It's absurd of you to ask me to back up 'my claim' that the govt. knows where it is,I was saying that there is no chance that if the plane crashed into the ocean that modern subs wouldn't have picked up the black box pings within 30 days.
|
You said the government knows where it is, and is covering it up. You stated it as a fact, rather than your opinion. A fact can be shown, or else it's not a fact. If you can't show it, then it's your opinion.
Quote:
Like I said,a little broader vision brings with it,it's own conclusions.
Best wishes and no offense taken/meant.
|
But in a debate a statement must be backed up with facts, or else it is just opinion. Vision has nothing to do with it. What you say may be true, but you can't expect people to take your word for it, especially when you accuse others of swallowing lies. Until disproven, the government story may also be true.