Quote:
Originally Posted by vanjast
More smoke and mirrors...
Actually stating the claim before the data is analysed.. cart-before-the-horse ?
Sound more like the Politics of Science than research, to me
 |
They analyzed the data for 3 years before publishing. The authors/researchers stated they welcome all peer review and criticism, because that's how it's done.
Maybe their work is flawed, but they couldnt find any. That could just be observers' bias, or it could be legit.
Only time, and peer review, will tell.