I guess I'm not listening to radical enough feminists as I've haven't heard a single word about establishing a matriarchy.
I'm also wondering what that tremendous abuse it is you talk about. If there's a push in schools or in general, the education system, to get boys and men to accept girls and women as their "masters", the radical feminists are doing a very poor job in pushing their agenda.
That ever recurring theme of erosion of family values, destroying of families, letting mothers not be mothers. What you see as an attack on families or mothers, I see as giving them a choice to do what suits them best. It's not like anybody is forcing them to give their child(ren) into day care. If the mother can live with her choice, who's to tell her she's wrong? That's also one thing feminism is fighting for, not shaming women for their choices.
Can't comment on that letter, as it didn't make the news here and I have not read when you posted it, maybe you could provide the link or the name of the politician?
Quote:
|
Men and women tick differently. And genderists deny that and claim there are no genetic fundaments for differences but differences all are due to culture and education, and any boy or girl can be made to tick like a boy or girl as desired.
|
How about some citations? I mean what you wrote sounds patently absurd, I would like to know who, in all seriousness, makes such a claim, which could only be proven if you had free reign to try that out.
Quote:
|
And feminists say women tick much better and men are evil tickers.
|
Feminists say..., yeah all of them or just the most radical? You know to be a feminist, or member of any other group that fights for a cause, you don't have to agree with all views of the most radical to call yourself one of them.