Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980
Look at the photos I posted, back and right side of his head wiped out, skin flap held on part of the skull, his hair looks "wet", it's from the blood and brain matter blown out by the bullet, if bullet entered from the back, it would be the front and side of his head blown out, not the back and right side.Bullet entered around the temple, above it, perhaps right at or behind the harline.
|
You've never heard of gravity have you? By the time those photos were taken, the body was lying on its back for several hours giving plenty of time for fluids from the wounds to matt the hair. It didn;t have to have come from the moment the wound occurred and probably didn't given he was shot in the back of the head.
What caused the entry wound in the back of his head? You keep ignoring evidence where it doesn't suit you.
Quote:
|
The autopsy is questionable, they rushed him away from Dallas against Texas lawto let Doctors they could control, ie military perform the autopsy.Doctors who did see him at the hospital have told different stories.Then they "lost" his brain lol, that sure helps muddy the waters.This is classic disinformation crap, it apparently works on some people who smugly say "well I believe the government because you can't give me the exact evidence I want", the evidence that the government has hidden or destroyed.Even though there is a lot of evidence supporting multiple shooters, some continue to deny.Easier to live in the bubble I suppose..
|
You can't have it both ways. Either the evidence from the autopsy is rubbish or not, yet you use the photos to support your conspiracy theory.
In order to believe in a JFK conspiracy, we'd probably also have to believe that every member of the Warren Commission panel was up to no good, with all of these guys rigging the Warren Report to paint Lee Oswald as a sole assassin (and the lone killer of Dallas city policeman J.D. Tippit as well).
And in such a "conspiracy mindset", it would also almost assuredly mean that many, many members of the House Select Committee On Assassinations in the late 1970s were also no-good, lying SOBs too -- because that committee came to the same basic conclusion that the Warren boys did in 1964, when it came down to the question of: "How Many Bullets Struck the victims; With the answer being:
only 2 shots hit any of the victims in the President's limousine; & both of those bullets came from behind the vehicle. The physical evidence backs that up regardless of what you think you know.