[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

I watched the footage with my own two eyes, it reminds me of shooting cantaloupes when I was a kid, sometimes if bullet impacted right or left of center, it blew out the side and back, exactly what it looked like in this case.That combined with how he snapped back, indicating a bullet impact from the front, to the side, perhaps with a sharp angle.

Except for the part where in the film the spray is clearly flying forward.

These photos clearly show the side/back of his head blown out, indicating an exit wound.Had the bullet entered from the back, the front and side would have been blown out.Kennedy's movements from the impact(back and slumped to the left) match the damage his head suffered.

I already quoted the right-side photo. My quote showed diagrams of the head, and the part that was blown out was the center, neither front nor back. From that alone the bullet could have entered from either direction.

The official story(like so many the government puts out) just makes no sense, it is inconsistent with the evidence.

It only makes no sense to you because you are already convinced that you know the truth, and you don't. You've said that bit about inconsistency and evidence many times, yet you've failed to show the inconsistency. It's what you want to believe. As I've said, I don't pretend to know one way or the other, but what you keep claiming as "proof" is nothing of the kind.

Putting the debate over the direction of the head shot

Nothing proven. It has been shown that the shot could have easily come from either direction.

the magic bullet

Only "magic" if the subjects were sitting a certain way. It has been shown that it would be easy for them to be sitting in another position and the bullet suddenly travels in a straight line. Not "magic" at all.

along with multiple accounts of shots coming from the grassy knoll, reports of hearing more than 3 shots

Also multiple accounts of other things that couldn't possibly have happened, and from the same witnesses.

and the nearly impossible shots from where Oswald allegedly fired

What "impossible shots" would those be. It has been shown many times that Oswald could easily have made those shots, yet you keep ignoring that.

proves a conspiracy, more than one shooter.

Proves nothing at all. If there was proof, there wouldn't be all these people still trying to prove it. So far you have no proof at all, just the claims and the willingness to believe.

one of the likely chief conspirators

Again you have to resort to allegation, because there is nothing else. Either you have proof of a conspiracy or you don't. So far you don't, despite what you keep claiming.

makes things obvious.

Only to someone who already believes. Your mind is made up, and you keep arguing "facts" that have been shown to be wrong, or at least questionable, and ignoring everything to the contrary.