[CaptainMattJ.]

Originally Posted by August

At least three different women accused Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct.

I know, and i know thats what he was referring to. But how does that pertain at all to GZ?

We know bill clinton got a BJ. We dont know anything conclusive in the GZ case, there wasnt enough evidence to convict nor was there really enough to totally redeem him.

The two are completely different. I simply dont understand why he would bring it up.

Originally Posted by Armistead

There was one male witness that saw Martin on top of him beating him, then he heard the gun shot. Regardless of how they came together, that's what saved his butt. Obviously the jury had enough solid information to find him not guilty. That's redemption.

Obvious many will try to connect his behavior now to the Martin case, but it resolves nothing. As many said, when his trial was over, his life was pretty much ruined anyway. I suspect he will continue to spiral out of control.

As tribesman said, absence of proof is not proof of absence. In the eyes of our law system, he is innocent until proven guilty. In reality, there are plenty of people who are guilty but have not enough proof to convict. There is not enough solid evidence to prove that he didnt do it just like there isnt enough solid evidence to prove he was guilty.

I wasn't connecting his behavior necessarily to the martin case. Ive just been saying that based on the multiple accusations now of him being an jerk, that he really IS a jerk.