More bollocks from you Bubbles. If JFK wasn't shot in the back of the head why was there a 6mm diameter entry wound in the back of his head? And why was the right side of his head shattered in the way it was? If you are going to make wild ass claims then at least back them up with some evidence. The autopsy reports, x-rays and photos don't support a frontal shot at all.
Exit wounds don't look like this. You can also see the flap of bone on the right side of the head FORWARD of the entry wound.
Plus: The autopsy report is pretty clear on where the large wound was really located -- it was "chiefly parietal" -- not "chiefly occipital". Seems pretty clear to me.
Moreover, those THREE THINGS (the autopsy photos, the X-rays, and the autopsy report) CORROBORATE EACH OTHER. They fit together like bread and butter, like a hand and a glove, or like Dave Healy and his crackpipe.
The pictures, X-rays, and autopsy report are the things that positively refute the notion that JFK had a big hole in the back of his head.
But of course as a dedicated CT pundit you will claim that this evidence is all faked.
