Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippelspanner
Uh, what?
In this case, the problem was a soldier failing his duty knowingly breaking the law/Geneva convention, cam or no cam. You make it sound as it would have been better to sweep it under the rug. Nothing happened, move along.
Do I understand his actions? Completely!
Yet that doesn't make it right. Law is law, he knew what he was doing.
|
Not at all. He did wrong and has been convicted for it. However had there been no camera the case is very unlikely to have come about at all.