[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

I do not care if McChrystal broke regs especially if it was private convo, not on the record and he made a remark.

So you do not care whether he broke the law or not? He was unjustly fired by Obama even if he did break the law? First, he hasn't been fired, just suspended pending investigation.

Steve, you will disagree with anything I say, so it is what its like.

Only when you ignore the facts in pursuit of your agenda. Say something that is accurate and I will agree with you.

Just because can not prove something right at moment, does not make it not true.

But I proved you absolutely wrong in this case. When are you going to figure that out?

I freely admitted to three posibilities, but all three involved the law in one form or another. I also showed how the law worked in this case. In spite of that you still keep going back to your same line of "Oh, he was kicked out for gambling." I patently showed that was not true, but you still keep running to it. Are you still claiming to be involved with the law? If so, how is it that the law in this case means nothing to you?

I am sure if you really looked into obama and understood this "man", you would see how it fits.Like I just said, Woodward and Bernstein did not have proof initially, it later came out.Obama counts on people like you who unwisely given him the benefit of the doubt despite the pattern of behavior.Then again, that is part of the game, keep us fighting amongst ourselves, takes attention away from what his government is doing.

I'm not giving him the benefit of anything. Nothing that is said or done on this forum will affect what Obama does or doesn't do, even if everyone here agreed with you. The issue here is that this is an open discussion forum, to a point. In a debate one must prove one's claims, or at least make an attempt to back them up. So far you haven't even tried. You claim that you are right, and when someone asks you to give evidence you turn around and say that even it you can't prove it now it still might be true. That isn't debate, it's mudslinging, hoping something will stick.

In the interest of real debate, I would challenge you to give any evidence at all. Or, as the saying goes, put up or shut up. A little honesty goes a long way.