Quote:
Yes Yes, lets ask about a part of a law I read in 210 after it was passed. A 2,000 plus page law by the way and if can't remember every little details, lets try to discredit, just stop tribesman, it's personal for you, you never prove your point. I offer points that are accepted fact much of the time. The law has a 15 percent tax on medical equipment along with others that are one reason costs are going up as costs gets passed along to the consumer.
I am just going to ignore you because it is personal and you will never be fair or try to discuss anything, you attack.
|
[Bolding is mine]
From Bubbles Post #35:
Quote:
|
Really, it is not complicated, people like to make things complicated and hope the truth gets lost in all noise.
|
I see...the law is
not complicated when you want to make your "point", but is a complicated "2,000 plus page law" with hard to remember details when your point is challenged. How very convienient, n'cest pas? A truly remarkable document, as transmutable to your whims as the ideas of logic, reason, ethics, or civility seem to be in your world. It also seems duplicitty is a large part of your stock. May I also suggest you have added equivocation to your repertoire?...
As I pointed out before, your speil is becoming quite tiresome. Not only have you become as the adults in a "Peanuts" cartoon or the "blah, blah, blah, Ginger, blah, blah, blah" dog, you are like some bad stand-up comedian who only has one five-minute routine he repeats over and over. We've heard it all before, too many times, and the jokes are no longer funny, if they ever were to begin with...
<O>