Quote:
Originally Posted by vienna
I really doubt you have even read the decision or any of the precedents cited in the decision. I belive you get most of your "opinions" from the nutjob drivel of Rush, Sean, and the other neo-Goebbels of the Far Right loonies. It is interesting to note the Far Right media, being unable to defend their allegations or counter the actual law and logic of the decision, now resort to the usual, tired, hackneyed fallbacks of conspiracy theories ("blackmail") or unbased innuendo ("He's gay..."). Why don't you just call him a "Commie" to complete the stew of blather you and your sort spew...
I would suggest, if you really wish to practice law, you learn to read and understand the law, relevant court findings, and maybe throw in a generous helping of logic and discernment; otherwise the future of your legal career may be found on bus bench ads so poular among the ambulance chasers...
Of course, your own bus bench ads are dependent on your actually passing the Bar; but, then, you will have already finished polishing your "I'm a victim of of a Liberal, Left-Wing Law School education" screed in anticipation. Perhaps you can find a closeted gay professor or Dean to blackmail...
<O>
|
I read the decision and it was garbage, just like the government's arguments in front of the court.Really, it is not complicated, people like to make things complicated and hope the truth gets lost in all noise. Fact is, Robert's changed his mind with no real reason why.One, he was concerned about his court's legacy or there was blackmail etc. Yes, it is possible, blackmail etc does occur and Robert's homosexuality rumors were around long before.I don't care if he is a homosexual but I do care if he was blackmailed and given the tactics of obama and his loyal band of ignorant followers, it is likely this happened.There simply was no logical legal basis for his decision, he pulled it out of his rear and attempted to justify it, the end.