Apparently in relation to post#7 I have to make an argument as to why what it addresses is stupid and not rely on it being patently obvious that it is stupid.
So here you go Sailor, just for you.
The document in question is large and complex, it contains lots of words which have very specific meanings.
It directly references a vast array of other lengthy complex documents covering a wide range of subjects and numerous different government departments, all of which also contain lots of words with very specific meanings.
The person in question has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to understand the meaning of very basic words.
Since much of this document is of a very legalese nature it also requires an ability with legal definitions as well as ordinary word definitions.
The person in question has also repeatedly demonstrated that even very basic legal definitions are beyond their ken.
On those points alone it is safe to say the claim that was made by bubblehead is utterly and unquestionably false, or to use the technical term ..... complete bull.
Numerous references are available on this forum which proves that to be true, if anyone is unfamiliar with any examples they need go no further than the first page of GT to get plenty of samples which prove it without any shadow of a doubt.
That should be enough, but as is my habit I will further the point with a question.
Throughout the States large numbers of well paid teams of top legal experts have been crawling through this document to try to get a grasp on not only the basics but all the intricate fine details and all their implications and ramifications. After all its a big issue with lots of big money involved.
Why are all these corporations paying all those lawyers to try and decipher the complicated maze of legislation if they could just hire bubbles who already understands it perfectly?
