What's the difference seeing an animation in recorded gameplay versus playing yourself? It's the same animation. No they don't look very life-like. It also didn't have a multi-million mocap behind it?
What's your point here then? The animations are no better than in the marketing materials they released and not of the same quality as a AAA release? The heck did you expect?
Which other bugs then? Don't deflect, argue. Thus far I've noticed some GUI issues as well. Mostly display issues, where something doesn't update correctly, and outside of the actual gameplay.
I did not say you mentioned GR/R6, I asked literally "compared to what?". What are you comparing to here? Some fantastical perfect dream game or something that actually exists?
Frankly haven't seen the AI behavior you're describing, but I have seen it do a lot of things right. A flawed AI doesn't mean it's garbage. To date in all these years I've never seen AI that's particularly impressive; all of it screws up regularly. From what I've seen thus far it does more right then wrong.
Different character models takes more than just photoshop.
The cheap excuse here is that fanboi card that always gets played when someone disagrees. There's definitely some polish needed here and there, but the thrashing you gave it is imho completely unfounded.
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia.
|