View Single Post
Old 02-27-06, 10:11 PM   #27
VON_CAPO
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 588
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trenken
Von Capo,

He doesnt mean compress, as in rerender the video to make it smaller. He meant compress as in zip the file up in an attempt to make it a smaller download, then you unzip it and watch. It could have knocked off a nice chunk of that file size.

I tried it 3 times and each time it starts off strong at about 200k download, then it drops to like 50k after a while.
Check this please: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...italvideo.mspx

"""With text files, size is less important because the files are full of “spaces” and can be compressed very tightly—a text file can be made at least 90 percent smaller, resulting in a high compression ratio (the ratio of compressed data to uncompressed data).
Other file types, like MPEG video or JPEG photos, hardly compress at all because they're in a format that's tightly compressed to begin with."""


But, if you get some compression, it will be expending image quality.

A technical explanation: when you decompress a image the pixel pattern never will be the same than the original one. Sometimes this is unnoticeable, sometimes not.
Example: An original file has 100K
After compression it has 30K
After decompression it has 100K again.
But the original pixel pattern had been changed forever.
VON_CAPO is offline   Reply With Quote