View Single Post
Old 09-11-13, 02:35 AM   #170
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,055
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

@Mittelwaechter

The eyewitness interviews in NSA are highly edited and as such no better than written testimonies.
I already showed you how they edited out Mr. Turcios stating that the plane
struck the Pentagon.

Here's another from CIT's older video "PentaCon", with extended interviews.


41:27 - William Lagasse: "[..]yawed substantially before it hit the building."

Again, that bit is edited out from NSA, quite understandably as it would show
that even their own eyewitnesses think/saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

Quote:
EDIT: And the radar operators stated, the 270° right turn to approach the Pentagon from the west was perfect and jet fighter like.
They were describing how the jet was flying, don't take it so literally.

"The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in
the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a
military plane," says O'Brien. "You don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's
unsafe."

Quote:
Hanjour couldn't even handle a Cessna 176.
In 2000, that is. He continued to train after that. He also had both private and
commercial licenses.
No one has claimed he was a great pilot, but pilot enough to crash the plane.

EDIT: Oh and here's a thread you might find interesting:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=87823

It's "Lyte Trip" aka Craig Ranke from CIT challenging Mark Roberts' witness list
regarding Pentagon and pretty much getting his butt handed to him.

Have fun!

Last edited by Dowly; 09-11-13 at 04:51 AM.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote