Why are people cherry picking lone witness statements and adding armchair psychology and layman opinions to them as if doing so means something
?
Oh, and:
Quote:
|
A. I doubt the official story! I stated more than once. You ask me why and what "Proof" I have for my doubts.
|
I hate this buzzword. As if the only reason why people believe Usama was behind 9/11 was because,
"oh, the gubmint sed so and I dun' trust 'em".
9/11 was witnessed by probably thousands of people who happened to be in and around the city of Manhattan and other "sites" that day, and by millions more watching TV footage. Then there's all the people who were directly involved -- fighter pilots, air traffic controllers, firefighters, politicians, men in charge of handling rescue operations, the list goes on.
After 9/11, the events of that day have been thouroughly investigated, and exhaustively looked into and studied by countless people all over the world. Intelligence agencies and world governments, many of which hated the Bush regime and/or the United States with a passion, have spent countless hours piling over every scrap of info they could get their hands on.
Trying to handwave all this by running your mouth about the "official story" borders on sheer respectlessness.