Quote:
Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter
We can assume the plane was somewhere close to him, but we should NOT consider his claims to be a fact.
Agreed?
|
Yes, I agree the plane was somewhere near him.
Can't say I agree with the reason why Ed Paik said what he said.
My take on it is that either it was edited out or he was lead so that he didn't think
it was necessary to say where he was at the time, for example, maybe he was
just asked to come outside and show the path he thinks the plane took.
I don't have anything to back that up, though. I tried to look for the interview
transcript on CIT's site as they say in the video they have them, but I couldn't
find Ed Paik's interview transcript.